Latest Articles
Journal of Design Service and Social Innovation (JDSSI) is an international scholarly journal published by MSPL. JDSSI implements peer-reviewed, open access policy for original articles, and published four times a year (quarterly) in both print and online formats. All articles in JDSSI are under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND, version 4.0). Copyright for each article belongs to its author(s) and is published by Michelangelo-scholar Publish Ltd.
JDSSI covers the fields of design service, social innovation, and design culture, and is an academic platform dedicated to the study of design issues and the exploration of social innovation service approaches. JDSSI aims to share innovative design ideas and solutions, explore issues such as sustainable design and consumer services and promote design for harmonious social development and multicultural exchange, with a particular focus on the dissemination of design theories and ideas between East and West across cultures. MSPL hopes to promote the development of design and culture between East and West, and strives to be in the leading position in this field. Researchers from different fields are welcome to submit manuscripts.
Vol 3, 2025
PUBLISHED BY MICHELANGELO SCHOLAR PUBLISH LIMITED
ADDRESS: ROOM A, 3/F, WING TAT COMMERCIAL BUILDING, 121-125 WING LOK STREET, SHEUNG WAN HK
TEL: 00852-36197566
FAX: 00852-36197558; WHATSAPP: +60 11-2370 2845
by
Jiaqi Chen ,
1,Jing Liu *
Chih-Chun Lai
Yun-Hua Liou *,
1,by
JDSSI is an international scholarly journal that was registered in February 2023, dedicated to the publication of high quality original design research (published quarterly in print and online simultaneously). JDSSI implements peer review and open access policies, with a focus on design innovation issues in multidisciplinary fields for social services.
Thematic research articles, literature review, and book reviews are the three types of original articles accepted by the journal. Among the subjects addressed are design service and assessment, social innovation theory and practice, and design as a driving strategy for social and cultural construction. JDSSI aims to share innovative design ideas and solutions, explore issues such as sustainable design and consumer services and promote design for harmonious social development and multicultural exchange.
Submit your manuscript: jdssi.editorialmanager03@gmail.com
See Instructions for authors for manuscript requirements.
February 22th, 2024
Call for Papers
Abstract: Design and its complexity are understood differently by the public. It is everywhere in our everyday lives, people without a background in design education may also differentiate poor designs. Consequently, the term “bad design” emerges. “Bad design” is loosely used, extending from design-specific to non-design fields. However, there is yet to be a universally accepted academic definition of what constitutes bad design. Why do bad designs exist? How do bad designs become distributed and adopted by the public? Adopting netnography methodology, this study involves gathering samples of public opinions on bad designs from internet forums in Reddit. The first objective of the research is to untangle the concept of bad design that may stem from intentional or unintentional causes. Unintentional—due to the designers’ negligence—or intentional, to benefit certain parties. The study reveals that public posts often highlight design failures across various fields—ranging from industrial products to government systems—focusing on aesthetic flaws, poor functionality, and exploitative “dark patterns.” Regardless of the causes, bad designs have the potential to result in harm, whether to their users, the environment, or the business sector, disadvantaging certain groups or stakeholders. Considering these aspects, our second objective is to develop a tool to identify bad design elements.
“Bad Design Canvas” is devised as a suggested tool to assess and rethink our current design practice, to be more mindful. This canvas holds the potential to be beneficial for designers and design students in identifying deficiencies and evaluating existing bad designs. The values of good design may be easier to be recognized by designers or professionals in the design field, whereas bad designs can be noticed by the public as users. While it may not be possible to eliminate bad design completely, it is the responsibility of design practitioners to recognize and minimize its occurrence in their practices.
Savira Aristi *,
1,Virliany Rizqia Putri
by
Hao Fu
by
Jing Liu *,
Lijiuchun He ,