Retraction
What is a Retraction? Defining the Fundamental Concept
Official Retraction
A retraction is the official withdrawal of a published article from the scientific literature by the journal editor or publisher. It signifies that the article contains serious flaws or invalid data that undermine its findings.
Notification of Errors
Retractions serve as a public notification to the scientific community and the broader public that the published work cannot be relied upon due to identified errors or misconduct.
Maintaining Integrity
The retraction process is essential for maintaining the integrity and reliability of the scientific record. It ensures that flawed or fraudulent research does not continue to influence scientific knowledge or practice.
Reasons for Retraction: Scientific Misconduct Explored
Fabrication
Involves inventing data or results and reporting them as genuine, which is a serious breach of ethical standards and research integrity.
Falsification
Manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
Plagiarism
Presenting someone else's ideas, results, or words without giving appropriate credit, which undermines the originality and credibility of the published work.
Ethical Breaches: Fabrication, Falsification, and Plagiarism
Fabrication
Researchers create fictitious data, often to support a desired hypothesis or outcome. This undermines the very foundation of scientific inquiry.
Falsification
Researchers manipulate or alter existing data to achieve a specific result, leading to distorted conclusions and potentially harmful consequences.
Plagiarism
Researchers present another person's work as their own, violating copyright laws and undermining the intellectual contributions of others in the field. This includes both text and figures.
Unintentional Errors: Statistical Mistakes and Methodological Flaws
Statistical Errors
Inappropriate application of statistical tests or misinterpretation of results can lead to incorrect conclusions. This requires robust peer review.
Methodological Flaws
Design flaws in research studies or experiments can result in biased or unreliable data. These flaws may go unnoticed during the initial peer review.
Data Handling Errors
Mistakes in data collection, entry, or analysis can compromise the accuracy of research findings and necessitate a retraction. Clear data management is necessary.
Reasons for Article Retraction in JDSSI
Data Errors
Inaccuracies or inconsistencies in data collection or analysis may lead to the retraction of a manuscript.
Ethical Violations
Breaches of ethical guidelines, such as plagiarism or failure to obtain informed consent, can necessitate retraction.
Duplicate Publication
Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously or publishing overlapping content can result in retraction.
Conflicts of Interest
Undisclosed conflicts of interest that could bias the research findings may prompt retraction.
Transparency in Academic Communication
Transparency serves as the cornerstone of academic integrity and builds trust within the scientific community. When issues arise, clear and open communication becomes even more critical.
Honest Reporting
Journals must report revocations openly. They must disclose the reasons for withdrawal, including specific concerns identified, methodological issues discovered, or ethical violations found. This transparency helps other researchers understand what went wrong and prevents similar issues in future research. The timing and manner of disclosure are equally important as the disclosure itself.
Clear Policies
Clear guidelines are needed for handling misconduct. These policies should outline specific procedures for investigation, documentation requirements, and communication protocols. Journals must establish and publicize their standards for addressing various types of academic misconduct, from minor oversights to serious ethical violations. This clarity helps all stakeholders understand their responsibilities and rights.
Accountability
Accountability is crucial. It protects research integrity by ensuring that all parties - authors, reviewers, editors, and institutions - fulfill their responsibilities. This includes maintaining detailed records of the review process, documenting all communication regarding concerns, and following up on implemented corrections or retractions. Regular audits and transparent reporting mechanisms help maintain high standards of academic publishing.
Through these principles of transparency, the academic community can maintain the highest standards of scientific communication while fostering an environment of trust and continuous improvement.
Institutional Response to Research Misconduct
Academic institutions bear the critical responsibility of maintaining research integrity and responding effectively to allegations of misconduct. Their response must balance the need for thorough investigation with the protection of both the accusers and the accused, while maintaining the institution's scientific credibility and public trust.
Investigation
Institutions must conduct thorough and fair investigations to look into allegations of research misconduct, ensuring due process and fairness for all involved parties. This includes establishing formal committees, gathering evidence, conducting interviews, maintaining confidentiality, and following established protocols. The investigation process typically involves multiple stages: initial inquiry, formal investigation, and final determination, each with specific timelines and documentation requirements.
Corrective Measures
Institutions should implement appropriate corrective measures, such as retractions, sanctions, and training programs, to address the misconduct and prevent future occurrences. These measures may include withdrawal of publications, termination of research projects, revision of institutional policies, mandatory ethics training, enhanced supervision requirements, and where necessary, disciplinary actions ranging from formal warnings to termination of employment. The institution must also ensure proper documentation and reporting to relevant funding agencies and regulatory bodies.
Transparency
Institutions should maintain transparency in handling cases of research misconduct, providing clear and accessible information to the public and the scientific community. This includes communicating investigation findings to relevant stakeholders, publishing summary reports while protecting privacy rights, updating institutional policies and procedures based on lessons learned, and sharing preventive measures with the broader academic community. Regular updates should be provided to funding agencies, journal editors, and other institutions when appropriate, while maintaining necessary confidentiality protections.
Lates articles
Legal and Professional Consequences for Researchers
Research misconduct can have severe and long-lasting repercussions that impact a researcher's career, reputation, and future opportunities in academia and beyond. These consequences serve not only as deterrents but also as necessary measures to maintain the integrity of scientific research.
Loss of Funding
Researchers found guilty of misconduct may lose eligibility for future research funding from government agencies and private foundations. This often includes immediate termination of current grants, mandatory return of previously awarded funds, and being barred from applying for new grants for several years or permanently.
Job Termination
Researchers may face job termination or other disciplinary actions from their institutions, depending on the severity and nature of the misconduct. This can include suspension without pay, revocation of tenure, removal from leadership positions, and permanent dismissal. Future employment in research institutions may become extremely difficult.
Legal Action
In some cases, researchers may face legal action, such as lawsuits or criminal charges, for research misconduct, especially if it involves fraud or harm to others. This can result in fines, legal fees, and even imprisonment in severe cases involving federal grant fraud or endangerment of human subjects.
Professional Reputation Damage
The researcher's professional reputation may be permanently damaged, leading to difficulties in publishing future work, receiving peer review invitations, or participating in professional societies. Their previous work may face increased scrutiny and potential retractions.
Licensing and Certification Impact
For researchers in fields requiring professional licenses or certifications (such as medical doctors or clinical researchers), misconduct can result in suspension or revocation of these credentials, effectively ending their ability to practice in their field.
The severity of these consequences reflects the scientific community's commitment to maintaining research integrity and public trust in scientific findings. Institutions and regulatory bodies typically consider factors such as intent, scale of misconduct, and potential harm when determining appropriate sanctions.
Steps Taken by JDSSI in Addressing the Issue
Upon receiving concerns about the publication, JDSSI will implement a comprehensive three-phase response process to maintain academic integrity and transparency.
Investigation
JDSSI launched a formal investigation following established protocols. The journal assembled an independent review committee of subject matter experts to examine all research materials, raw data, and methodological procedures. This thorough investigation process took several months to complete, ensuring no stone was left unturned.
Notification
The journal informed all relevant parties about the investigation and its findings. This included direct communication with the authors, their affiliated institutions, and research funding bodies. JDSSI also notified other researchers who had cited the paper, ensuring transparency throughout the academic community. All communications were documented and handled with appropriate confidentiality.
Retraction
Following conclusive findings, the manuscript was officially retracted. JDSSI published a detailed retraction notice explaining the specific reasons for retraction, ensuring future researchers would understand the context. The journal updated all digital repositories and databases to reflect this change, and implemented measures to prevent similar issues in future submissions.
These steps demonstrate JDSSI's commitment to maintaining the highest standards of academic publishing while ensuring fair treatment of all parties involved.
Academic question type: Duplicate submission and publication
JDSSI is no longer responsible for the following paper:
Summary of Research on Miao Silver Ornaments in China: Statistics and analysis based on CNKI (1987-2020)
Zhang Hongying 1, Huang Shanshan 2, & Zhang Zongdeng 2 *
1. College of Arts, CITI University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
2. School of Packaging Design & Art, Hunan University of Technology, Hunan, China
Retraction in: https://doi.org/10.59528/ms.jdssi2023.0512a3
URL: https://www.michelangelo-scholar.com/upload/JDSSI-NO_00003A-20230512.pdf
Email: mspl-editor@michelangelo-scholar.com; m.scholar2023@gmail.com
Tel: 00852-36197566
Fax: 00852-36197558; WHATSAPP：+60 11-2370 2845
Address: ROOM A, 3/F, WING TAT COMMERCIAL BUILDING, 121-125 WING LOK STREET, SHEUNG WAN HK
JDSSI
MSPL
JACAC
JAUD